Field Guide
Vol. I
SEP 2026
No. 97
Short Science Facts · For Curious Kids, Parents & Teachers
Field Guide Entry 075

how photosynthesis was discovered

In August 1771, in a back-garden laboratory in Leeds, the English minister and chemist Joseph Priestley began with a simple problem: a candle and a mouse both used up the same air in sealed glass jars. The candle went out, and the mouse died. Then he tried something that changed science. He added a sprig of mint to another jar of tainted air, left it in a sunny window for ten days, and found that the air seemed to be restored. The candle burned again. The mouse breathed again. Priestley had noticed that plants could change air in a way that supported life, but he did not yet know why. That missing explanation came eight years later, at Bowood House in Wiltshire, where the Dutch physician Jan Ingenhousz repeated the experiments under many different conditions and found the key factor was light. His work showed that green parts of plants make oxygen in sunlight, while in darkness they do the opposite. What exactly was happening inside the leaves?

Watch the short · 60 sec
02What's Happening

The Mechanism

Joseph Priestley was born on 24 March 1733 in Fieldhead, near Birstall in the West Riding of Yorkshire, into a family of dissenting Calvinist clothiers. He trained at the dissenting Daventry Academy, took the ministry of a chapel in Suffolk in 1755, and by 1770 was a Presbyterian minister in Leeds — where his back garden happened to abut a public brewery, from which he obtained a constant free supply of the "fixed air" (carbon dioxide) fermenting off the beer vats. It was in this small back-garden laboratory in Meadow Lane, Leeds, that in August 1771 Priestley did the experiment that founded the modern understanding of plants. He took two glass bell jars. In one he sealed a lighted candle. It burned for a few minutes and went out. In another he sealed a mouse. It suffocated in a few minutes. He concluded that both the candle and the mouse had "injured" the air — respired something out of it. He then placed a sprig of mint inside a third bell jar of similarly "injured" air, sealed it, and left it in a sunny window for ten days. When he tried a burning candle in the jar afterwards, the candle burned. When he sealed a mouse in it, the mouse breathed. "The air had been perfectly restored by the plant," he wrote. Priestley published the observation in 1772 in the Royal Society's *Philosophical Transactions*: "Observations on Different Kinds of Air" (*Phil. Trans.* 62, 147–264) — a paper for which he was awarded the Copley Medal that same year. The result had a beautiful moral shape for a natural theologian: plants and animals were mutually necessary in the divine economy of air. But Priestley did not know what the plant was doing, and he could not always replicate his own results. Sometimes the mint restored the air; sometimes it did not. He blamed differences in the health of the plant. The real variable he was missing was found by another man. Jan Ingenhousz was born on 8 December 1730 in Breda, in the Dutch Republic, the second son of a leather merchant. He took his medical doctorate at Leuven in 1753 and moved to England in 1764 in his early thirties, where he came to the attention of Sir John Pringle, physician to Queen Charlotte, and became a leading British advocate of smallpox variolation. In 1768, Empress Maria Theresa of Austria — having lost two children and a daughter-in-law to smallpox — summoned him to Vienna to variolate her surviving children, including the future Emperor Joseph II. He succeeded, was rewarded with a lifetime pension and a court appointment as physician to the imperial family, and by 1778 was 47 and prosperous enough to spend the summer of 1779 in England as the private guest of Lord Shelburne at Bowood House in Wiltshire — where Priestley, since 1772, had been the family librarian and "literary companion." At Bowood over the summer of 1779, in a purpose-built glass laboratory on the grounds, Ingenhousz repeated Priestley's experiment more than five hundred times under systematically varied conditions. He replaced Priestley's mint with fresh sprigs of many plants, moved the bell jars into full sunlight, into shade, and indoors after dark, and measured the air chemically after each trial. He found the missing variable in a fortnight. It was light. In the sun, the green parts of the plant — only the green parts — produced "dephlogisticated air" (oxygen). In darkness, the same green plant did the opposite: it produced "fixed air" (carbon dioxide), like an animal breathing. The roots, the flowers, and the fruit did the second thing at all hours. Ingenhousz published in October 1779 a book with the title (in English, in London, in his own translation from the Latin): *Experiments upon Vegetables, Discovering Their Great Power of Purifying the Common Air in the Sun-shine, and of Injuring it in the Shade and at Night.* The 302-page volume, printed by P. Elmsly on the Strand, is the founding document of the science of photosynthesis. The next two decades filled in the rest of the chemistry: Jean Senebier in Geneva showed in 1782 that the CO₂ was the input, Nicolas-Théodore de Saussure showed in 1804 that the water was too. But the fact — that green plants, in light, use the sun's energy to invert the direction of animal respiration; the fact on which the whole of the Earth's atmosphere and every calorie in every organism now depends — was established at Bowood House in a set of glass bell jars in the summer of 1779. Ingenhousz spent much of the 1780s in Vienna as a court physician, was a personal correspondent of Benjamin Franklin, and died on 7 September 1799 at Bowood at the age of 68, of a lingering illness while visiting his old friend and rival Priestley's former English patron. Priestley himself, by then a religious dissenter driven out of England by a mob that burned down his Birmingham house in 1791, died in Pennsylvania in 1804 at 70.

03Why It Matters

Why It Matters

The surprising part is that the discovery did not begin with a grand theory. It began with jars, a candle, a mouse, and a sprig of mint. Priestley could see that plants could 'restore' air, but he did not know what part of the plant mattered or why the result changed. Ingenhousz solved the puzzle by testing the same idea more than 500 times and changing only one thing at a time. He found that light, not just the presence of a plant, was the missing ingredient. That turned a curious garden experiment into the foundation of photosynthesis, the process that helps create the oxygen animals breathe and supplies the food energy that supports nearly all life.

04Common Misconception

Wait — That's Not Quite Right

A common mistake is to think Priestley discovered photosynthesis in full. He found an important clue, but he did not explain the whole process. Another wrong idea is that any part of any plant always makes clean air. Ingenhousz showed that only the green parts do this in sunlight, while the same plant in darkness can release carbon dioxide instead. The discovery came from separating the effects of light, plant parts, and time of day.

05Words to Know

Vocabulary

  • photosynthesis
  • Joseph Priestley
  • Jan Ingenhousz
  • carbon dioxide
  • oxygen
  • fixed air
  • dephlogisticated air
  • bell jar
  • sunlight
  • respiration
  • green parts
  • chemistry
  • atmosphere
06Comprehension Check

Quick Quiz

5 questions · For classroom or kitchen table

1
What did Joseph Priestley first notice in his 1771 jar experiments?
2
What was the missing variable Jan Ingenhousz found in 1779?
3
Which parts of the plant did Ingenhousz find produced oxygen in sunlight?
4
What did Ingenhousz say plants did in darkness?
5
Which later scientist showed that carbon dioxide was an input for this process?
07Try This at Home

The Experiment

Test Light and Leaves

Find a leafy houseplant or a few fresh spinach leaves and put them near a window for a day. At the same time, keep a second small group of leaves in a dark cupboard or a box. Do not seal them in airtight containers or try to measure gases. Instead, compare how the leaves look after several hours and again the next day, especially their color and freshness.

Now sketch both groups side by side. Which one looks brighter or firmer, and which one starts to droop or lose color first? This is only an observation, not a proof of photosynthesis, but it helps show why light matters to plants. Priestley and Ingenhousz used glass jars and sunlight to uncover a similar pattern: green plant parts behave differently in light and dark.

If you want a second step, place one leaf in a sunny spot and another in shade, then compare them after another day. Use a notebook to write down the time, the location, and what changed. Adults should help if you are moving plants or using jars.

houseplant or fresh spinach leaves, paper and pencil, window, box or cupboard for shade, adult supervision for moving plants and glass jars

The Weekly Dispatch

Want next week's entry in your inbox?

One short email a week with the latest field guide entry — the fact, the explanation, the quiz, and the activity. Free for parents and teachers.

For adults only · Unsubscribe anytime